Posted by: aspirantlocavore | July 16, 2008

why wall-e rocked my world

(just wanna warn you before you read this that i get pretty hardcore in here, i may offend some people, but hey, let’s argue a bit if you don’t like what i say!!)

so i went to see wall-e the other day. OH MY GOD.

it’s the best movie ever. and i had just seen kung-fu panda the weekend before and declared that my new favourite movie. but wall-e takes things to a whole new level. i don’t wanna say too much because i really want you all to see it and i don’t wanna give away too much. but let’s just say that it is about everything i hold to be true. man, i want to discuss it in a LOT more detail, but maybe later. i’ll give it a week or two. then i’ll write something with the disclaimer ’spoilers’ so you know not to read it if you haven’t seen the movie.

anyway, i so loved the movie that i was totally flabbergasted when my movie-buff boyfriend sent me a link to this article by the AV Club. apparently there is a massive backlash of hatred directed towards poor old wall-e. i couldn’t believe it… how could any sane person HATE this film? then, as i read the article, i realised these were not the opinions of sane people. these are in fact the opinions of complete and utter morons. no wonder our planet is as f#$%ed up as it is, if people like these actually exist out there. it really saddens me that they do…

for those of you who have seen the movie, please read some of these extracts from the article and weep with me for the sad state of these peoples’ minds.

apparently wall-e promotes leftist facism!!! (note that the guy from AV Club who wrote the article was pretty much taking the same viewpoint that i am) and i quote:

Shannen Coffin, however, had harsher things to say:

From the first moment of the film, my kids were bombarded with leftist propaganda about the evils of mankind. It’s a shame, too, because the robot had promise. The story was just awful, however. Nice to see that Disney and Pixar can make mega-millions off of telling us just how greedy, lazy, and destructive we all are.

(Right, as opposed to making millions off of telling us how powerful, righteous, and handpicked for greatness by almighty God we are.)

Another wacko opinion says:

In his essay “WALL-E: Economic Ignorance And The War On Modernity,” Stolyarov cites the fact that fast-food restaurants are serving “health foods,” “landfills are remarkably effective at storing garbage,” and that traditional farming is, like, hard and stuff as flaws in the film’s logic:

WALL-E is an assault on modern civilization, borne of deep economic and historical ignorance. The film shamefully betrays the efforts of countless heroic individuals who have raised humanity out of the muck of barbarism. Its anti-technological, anti-capitalist message needs to be exposed and countered by all thinking individuals.

Yes, us “thinking individuals” need to remember that capitalism is the shining light – lifting millions out of poverty everyday and promoting the protection of the environment above all else. i’m no socialist myself but COME ON people… i hardly have any words, this kind of dumbness makes me so angry.

next on the hate list is that wall-e is prejudiced against fat people! oh geez. oh geez. are fat people stupid too? the movie is NOT about them. the fatness is symbolic. i don’t even think i should have to be explaining this. i can’t believe people have such chips on their shoulders. i didn’t complain that the movie made HUMANS look bad, did i? and if i’m truly honest, maybe a certain category of ‘fat’ person should take some flak here… if you are a junk food guzzling person who has no conception of the damage your conumerist lifestyle has on the planet, then YES, YOU are causing the destruction of our planet. there – i said it. shoot me down.

but before you do… just read this:

WALL-E has also managed to piss off America’s “fat pride” community. “Food, fat, feminism” blog The F Word accuses Pixar of “using animation skills for evil” in its perpetration of discriminatory attitudes toward the overweight, saying:

WALL-E specifically singles out and targets obese people as the primary cause of mankind’s demise, further perpetuating the stereotype of the gluttonous, slothful fat person. Furthermore, the film suggests that, in their exaggerated laziness, obese people disregard not only personal health, but also that of the planets, and are held up as the cause for the destruction of the environmental landscape. This is, despite mountains of evidence that show, as a group, fat people do not eat more than thin people, nor are they less active, and that the so-called “obesity epidemic” has been greatly exaggerated by self-serving corporate interests.

 

golly lady, the movie wasn’t ever supposed to be about FAT people. they got fat AFTER the world fell apart.

the final part of the backlash against wall-e is true. but it’s such a hysterical example of how psychotic corporations are that it’s not even funny anymore… but i don’t blame the creative team at Pixar. i think that, to make a film so incredibly moving, they had to believe in those things themselves. it’s not their fault the company they work for (Pixar) was bought by the Evil Disney Corporation. read this, to see how sad our world really is:

WALL-E is hypocritical… is the fact that the film, like every Disney product, inevitably comes packaged with the usual tide of tie-in crap, plastic trinkets that roll off the conveyor belt predestined for the landfill. Take Devin Faraci’s report on the film’s press junket for CHUD:

The room was stuffed with what seemed like a hundred or more tie-in products ranging fromWALL-E branded plastic Crocs (with tire tread patterns on the soles) to plastic WALL-E action figures to WALL-E branded clothing and bed sets and drapes. When asked which of the items were made with post-consumer recycled material or were made of biodegradable material, the PRbot giving the pitch seemed flustered. She said that they tried to use such materials whenever possible, and pointed out a post-consumer WALL-E branded Kleenex box. Every environmental group will beg you to avoid Kleenex, since they’re wiping out Canada’s Boreal Forest to give you a place to blow your nose, so the Kleenex connection is fucking pathetic in itself for a movie that trumpets taking care of the environment.

Or better yet:

Oddly enough, this also forms the basis for condemnation by The National Review’s Greg Pollowitz, who gets so apoplectic in his effort to paint the movie as leftist propaganda that he accidentally reinforces the movie’s message:

It was like a 90-minute lecture on the dangers of over-consumption, big corporations, and the destruction of the environment. All this from mega-company Disney, who wants us to buyWALL-E kitsch for our kids that are manufactured in China at environment-destroying factories and packed in plastic that will take hundreds of year to biodegrade.

GO AND SEE THIS FILM. IT’S BEAUTIFUL. SHOW IT TO YOUR KIDS. IF THEY DON’T WANT TO BECOME GREENPEACE ACTIVISTS AFTERWARDS, TAKE THEM TO A DOCTOR – THEY MAY BE BRAIN-DEAD.


Responses

  1. Ehem, you did notice that my post was made in November, well before Wall-E was even finished and released to the public. And I’m sure that you also must have seen my note at the top of the page you yanked my quotes from explaining this, as well as the added information that Pixar considerably reworked the film that you enjoyed so much in the theaters to tone down its depictions of fat people, before you took my comments out of context. But that would be assuming that you actually read my piece in its entirety now, would it? Obviously, you only read into my post what you wanted to read out of it. It’s a good thing you’re not a journalist.

  2. hi rachel, i apologise sincerely for just lifting the quote from AV Club and not visiting your actual site. i did so this morning after receiving your comments.
    but, my feeling of being a horrible, bad person evaporated when i noticed that, by your own admission, you HAVE NEVER EVEN SEEN WALL-E!!! you based your november comments on other people’s reviews.
    i quote from your re-worked WALL-E review written in July this year:
    My two posts — here and here – on Pixar’s Wall-E last fall drew strong reactions across the spectrum. At the time, the film was still in its developmental stage. I based my conclusions on the reviews of those who Pixar permitted to view the then-unfinished version. Those reviews overwhelmingly commented not on the film’s much-needed environmental cautionary messages, but on the ways in which fat people were portrayed to be the cause of the earth’s demise. I haven’t seen Wall-E yet, but from what I read, Pixar reworked the film to tone down its negative and discriminatory portrayals of fat people.

    so, don’t get on your high horse with me about what i did! what you did was just as bad, if not worse. cool… slating a movie you have never even seen.

  3. Nice piece.
    I always find it hugely entertaining when people’s dysfunctional desire to push their own agendas renders them blind to logic.

    Rachel – I HAVE seen the film and can put your mind at ease that at no point is it implied that fat people are in any way to blame for the planet’s state. Anybody who interprets this is LOOKING for something to be offended by and possibly has bigger problems than how they are being represented in the media.

    Having said that, the film certainly does imply that not doing any exercise and constantly stuffing your face with junk-food will result in massive weight gain. Which, as far as the research of some of the the world’s top dietitians has led us to believe, is perhaps not the most outlandish of assumptions.

  4. Oh and Ehem… in what way is the locavore taking your quote out of context any different than you taking the ‘fat’ issue in WallE out of context? I mean, how much context can you have without having seen the film? Any chance you recently gave up a career as a journalist?

  5. Wall-E totally looks like the robot from “Short Circuit”… minus the cheesy 80’s style of course

  6. Apology accepted. I should also point out that at the time of my original posts on Wall-E, no one (outside of a few critics Pixar permitted to view and review the film) had seen Wall-E, so your objection that I haven’t seen the film is really a moot point. And for further clarification, I made that post in response to concerns raised by the reviews of these critics so that my readers could write to Pixar and Disney for clarification about the film and to voice their concerns before the film’s release.

    After Wall-E was released and those old posts became news once again, I posted a follow-up on the film in which I admitted, full disclosure, that I hadn’t yet seen it. But what you fail to include in my comments you selectively chose to quote is that I also said I would reserve my comments and critiques on the film until after I had seen it for myself. I have yet to personally comment on or critique the version of Wall-E that has been released to the public.

    NRVS: My posts on Wall-E that the blog author quoted here, above, were made in the fall and were based on film reviews of the then-unfinished version of Wall-E, which was still in its production stages. Pixar considerably reworked the film since my comments were made in November, so the version released to the public is not the version I commented on in the fall. This is what I mean by quoting me out of context. It’s not unlike me commenting on the movie Notting Hill and then others taking those comments and making them in the context as if those comments were made on the movie Love Actually. Both films are similar in that they star Hugh Grant, but they’re completely different movies. Get it?

    It’s really a shame, AspirantLocavore, that you had to be so crass about all of this. I’m vegetarian who eats both organically and locally and had I learned of your blog before this, I probably would have been a reader of it. And judging from the lack of comments on your blog entries, readers are something you lack.

  7. wow, some strong words going down here.. i haven’t seen the movie (yet), but it certainly sounds like i should.

    @rachel: you’d be missing out if you discredit aspirant locavore’s blog so quickly, just because she has strong opinions that happen to conflict with your own equally strong ones… and being snide and sarcastic about how many readers she has or doesn’t have is, in my opinion, truly truly childish and entirely unnecessary.

  8. Well put mothercity… very unnecessary.
    With some people it’s hard to tell whether they have a chip on their shoulders or whether they are carrying a kayak around with them.

  9. Excellent piece of writing abd OH SO TRUE, locavore! I took my little 7-year old and I have to say I failed to see the part where the film was prejudiced against fat people. Maybe that’s when I went to the loo – oh wait I never went during that movie. Hmmm…
    The only message I got that had any relation to fat people was that you would get fat if you don’t exercise and just sit and stuff your face all day long. Call me prejudiced, but I thought that is what one calls a medical fact?
    I also found the message of “save the earth” and “don’t litter – we are destroying our planet” such an incredibly valuable lesson to teach future generations. Are we meant to hide the fact that we are slowly killing our planet from the very people we should be saving it for?
    Get your heads out your asses people. I think the message in the movie is GREAT – especialy since it ends on such a positive note!

  10. perhaps fat people should be discriminated against. save space.


Leave a response

Your response:

Categories